whistleblower (Lightspring/Shutterstock.com)

Whistleblower ‘dissent channels’ aren’t working, watchdog says

For decades, federal agencies have offered employees “dissent channels” -- formal and informal ways to offer differing professional opinions, complain or blow the whistle on wasteful or dangerous practices. Indeed, such channels proliferated among the reforms that followed the Nixon era, and yet, according to new reports, they often still don’t work.

A new analysis  in the Washington Post notes that “although some employees use the mechanisms without reprisal,” many feds -- from their own experience -- see dissent channels as useless, or worse. Dissenters said they often end up branded as troublemakers and frequently find their professional development curtailed. The piece explores a new report  from the Project on Government Oversight, as well as other sources.  

The article finds plenty of examples. Nuclear Regulatory Commission employees, when surveyed a few years ago, to a person reported that they suffered “negative consequences” after they used their agency’s dissent channel. Many State Department employees who objected through their dissent channel to this administration’s early travel ban from certain Muslim-majority countries were invited to separate by then-White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer.

And, currently, the Post piece notes, feds who are objecting to missteps in the federal coronavirus and racial justice protests response are enduring mishandled dissents, too.

Reader comments

Tue, Aug 4, 2020

And then there's the ones doing the malicious "whistleblowing" for purely political purposes and vindictiveness...

Tue, Aug 4, 2020

whistleblowers usually pay.

Tue, Aug 4, 2020

Yea, just look at LTC Vindman. He told the truth about the liar and chief or president bone spurs or whatever you want to call him and now his military career is over.

Tue, Aug 4, 2020

As most long time Feds recognize, the overwhelming majority of whistleblower complaints made are entirely bogus to begin with for a variety of reasons ranging from the whistleblower not having facts correct, having an animus toward a superior or mental or emotional instability. Unfortunately this reality makes even the few legit whistleblower complaints appear suspect.

Tue, Aug 4, 2020

We are under a pandemic so we can not expect things to be the same as last year.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above