Terms of USPS loan deal raise eyebrows

The U.S. Postal Service has reached an agreement with the Treasury Department over terms of a $10 billion loan provided for in the CARES Act, and it includes USPS handing over negotiated agreements with its top customers.

 On April 10, then-Postmaster General Megan Brennan estimated that the pandemic would “increase the Postal Service’s net operating loss by more than $22 billion dollars over the next eighteen months, and by over $54 billion dollars over the longer term, threatening our ability to operate.”

The $2 trillion CARES Act originally contained a $13 billion grant to USPS, but that effort “was blocked by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who warned such a move would kill the relief bill. A committee aide said Mnuchin told lawmakers during negotiations: ‘You can have a loan, or you can have nothing at all,’ the Washington Post reported in April.

Under the terms of the July 28 loan agreement, USPS can use the funding only for operational expenses with Treasury approval, must report monthly and quarterly on volume and must repay the loan within five years.

One other condition in the loan agreement has raised eyebrows: Prior to receiving the loan, USPS must give Treasury copies of its top 10 market dominant negotiated service agreements, top 10 competitive product NSAs and any updates on those NSAs.

The NSAs refer to the Postal Service’s agreements with high-volume shippers, such as Amazon. FedEx and UPS, in which USPS handles last-mile delivery in return for volume shipments.

Those agreements have been a source of contention between the Trump administration and USPS. The president has frequently accused the Postal Service of not charging shippers, particularly Amazon, enough to deliver their packages.

“I’m a little surprised that condition is even necessary,” John McHugh, chairman of the Package Coalition advocacy group, told the Washington Post. “The USPS itself has already hired outside consultants to look at these matters to determine if they’re profitable and fairly priced. If nothing else, if gives Treasury entree to what up to this point has been absolutely proprietary information between only the USPS and its customer.”

Several lawmakers said in a July 29 statement that the loan terms “would inappropriately insert the Treasury into the internal operations of the Postal Service using onerous loan conditions.” The statement was issued by the House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairwoman Carolyn B. Maloney (D-N.Y.),  Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Ranking Member Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), who chairs the House Oversight Subcommittee on Government Operations, and Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.).

“These terms would severely limit the Postal Service’s access to capital and could accelerate the demise of the Postal Service that all Americans, especially seniors, small businesses, veterans and those living in rural communities, rely upon every day, especially during the pandemic," the statement continued. "We will not stop fighting to protect this critical service that communities depend on and to ensure that every American can safely participate in the November elections.”

Postmaster General Louis DeJoy said the loan would help USPS “delay the approaching liquidity crisis.”  USPS “remains on an unsustainable path,” he said in a July 29 statement on the loan agreement. “[W]e will continue to focus on improving operational efficiency and pursuing other reforms in order to put the Postal Service on a trajectory for long-term financial stability.”

Although USPS currently does not need to tap into the loan, Mnuchin’s July 28 letter to DeJoy said “it is prudent to establish a borrowing facility that USPS may draw upon should the need arise.”

Reader comments

Mon, Sep 7, 2020 Anne

Amazon takes advantage of USPS and its lower prices. WH wants to look at customer contracts and I can completely agree as there may be contracts that should never have been signed, forcing the USPS into a losing situation. If so, review of the commercial contracts would show this and allow the administration to reevaluate USPS practices. The other reason the USPS needs help and is in constant financial trouble? Funding their pension plan for 75 years is required. That's insane. It needs adjusted. USPS needs a FULL review. This isn't an abuse of power. Its ensuring the contracts aren't making the taxpayer fund commercial customer's expenses for shipping and delivering.

Tue, Aug 4, 2020

Require all political/Government mailings to have a physical stamp. This would make increase the Post Offices revenue and reduce the amount of paper in our landfills.

Tue, Aug 4, 2020

TDS on display. Actual primary motivation is to stop USPS from subsidizing a private business (Amazon) at taxpayer expense by delivering its shipments at below actual cost.

Tue, Aug 4, 2020 Sam USA

THINK, please think. Why is our post office the ONLY government agency that has to Fully pay for itself????? Neither the Dept. of Energy, Secret Service, Agriculture Dept, nor US military has to fully pay for themselves. Why does the postal "SERVICE" have to pay for itself?? Why is our Post Office the only agency required to pay for a 5,000 employee Postal Inspection Service ___ while the FBI provides internal and external security for all other agencies.

Tue, Aug 4, 2020

Total WH abuse of power here. Postal Service should be getting better funding, as a public-backed entity -- not continuing to be shredded in these contorted efforts to give more profits to private sector friends, and undermining this 200 plus year old public trust we need now more than ever to provide nonpartisan service this fall in the pandemic-era election.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above.

2021 Digital Almanac

Stay Connected

Latest Forum Posts

Ask the Expert

Have a question regarding your federal employee benefits or retirement?

Submit a question