Lawmakers pen letter urging Congress to protect feds' collective bargaining rights

A letter signed by more than 200 lawmakers and initiated by federal employee unions is urging Congressional leadership to take immediate action to prevent the Trump administration from “undermining” the collective bargaining rights of federal employees.

“This is the first time in four decades that federal unions have had to come to Congress to ask for protection of the institution of fair collective bargaining, including their ability to collect union dues and obtain adequate amounts of official time to carry out legally-required representational duties,” the letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic budget leaders states.

According to the 218 lawmakers who signed the letter, agency budgets being finalized this month by Senate and House appropriators need to include a provision that would prevent the president’s political appointees from stripping federal employees of their collective bargaining rights and protections against whistleblower retaliation and other mismanagement.

Although a district court judge largely invalidated a collective bargaining executive order issued by the Trump administration last year that restricted employees’ use of “official time,” and limited collective bargaining rights, the White House is continuing to fight the decision in court.

“Without this provision, the Trump administration will likely succeed in crushing the federal employee unions, making a mockery of the collective bargaining guarantee and rendering the task of effectively representing union members all but impossible,” the letter continues, adding, “We who affirm the right of American workers to form, join, and operate independent labor unions must stand up for our federal employee unions in this precarious moment. They have sought our assistance as a last resort, but they need our help and they are unlikely to survive the Trump administration’s assault on their rights without our action.”

The Trump administration contends that the case challenging the collective bargaining and other workforce executive orders that curtail union activities at federal agencies should be heard by the Federal Labor Relations Authority, and not in court.


Reader comments

Thu, Sep 12, 2019

Clinton, Bush Jr, Obama and now this administration surely had and have poor and abusive policies for collective bargaining rights. It will continue as long as we have the idiots we enjoy in the congress and senate.

Wed, Sep 11, 2019

Clinton, Bush Jr, Obama and this make America Great Again president have gutted already weak unions who for years talked a lot, took dues and did little for current and former civil servants. Its vogue to pick and belittle civil servants and the democrats and republicans do a great job at this.

Tue, Sep 10, 2019 Sam USA

No Contract___ No Work. Each and every privae contractor who works for the government has a 'signed contract5 agreement with the government'. Each and every CEO, actor, actress, professional sports figure has a Signed Contract. No plumber or electrician, or home contractor or auto dealer will deal with you and do any work unless you first sign their contract agreement. No Contract __ No work. They all need to get some backbone and courage and just say No Contract ___ No work.

Tue, Sep 10, 2019 Hinterlands

Of course they want it heard by appointed stooges instead of a judge who would most likely prevent the Trumpsters from screwing those whom they consider peons. After all, it is not nice to prevent dictators from exercising their self-given rights. Sheesh!!

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

2020 Digital Almanac

Stay Connected

Latest Forum Posts

Ask the Expert

Have a question regarding your federal employee benefits or retirement?

Submit a question