By Mark Van Scyoc Royalty-free stock photo ID: 285175268

House Appropriators don’t support OPM-GSA merger

House appropriators want the Office of Personnel Management to improve on its core duties including retirement processing without support from a planned merger with the General Services Administration.

Lawmakers are expected to approve the Financial Services and General Government appropriation bill on June 11, sending the measure to the full House of Representatives. The bill includes a measure preventing a merger of OPM and GSA as planned by the Trump administration and preventing GSA from absorbing OPM programs and duties via outsourcing agreements using money from the FY 2020 appropriation.

The House Appropriations Committee's legislative report calls on OPM to do a better job on its own, with the $309 million in funding allowed by the bill. Lawmakers want OPM to speed up retirement processing, eliminate delays to federal hiring and improve the user experience at USAJOBS, the only front door for applicants to federal jobs.

The report also includes a section on the proposed reorganization that suggests lawmakers are concerned about staying in the loop about reorganization plans outside the scope of FY 2020 funding. Lawmakers want OPM to report to Congress and its own office of inspector general every quarter with detailed proposals under discussion, timelines for any move, proposed changes to staffing levels and more.

Acting OPM Director Margaret Weichert said in May that the merger was required to meet a coming budget shortfall created in part by the loss of a fee related to moving the National Background Investigations Bureau out of OPM and to the Department of Defense. But, she argued that the merger wasn't about closing the budget gap as much as treating federal HR -- from hiring to payroll to benefits and retirement processing -- like a shared service.

"We cannot buy our way out. We have to structurally change and look at an entirely new architecture for the future," she said at a press conference.

However, at a subsequent hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, lawmakers took Weichert to task for not including a detailed analysis in OPM's legislative proposal.

In the Appropriations Committee report, OPM is directed to move to a fully automated system for retirement and disability processing and to, within 90 days of the funding bill being enacted, spell out how agency officials plan to dig out of the retirement processing backlog. Additionally, lawmakers want OPM to deliver a plan to streamline and eliminate hurdles in the federal hiring process. The committee is also pushing for details on plans to modernize the Federal Financial Systems that support OPM's trust funds and for improvements to USAJOBS based on user feedback. Lawmakers tapped the Government Accountability Office for a report on how the site can be streamlined.

The committee also urged all federal agencies "to examine the fairness and equity of federal government shutdown policies and guidelines and their impact on contract employees." In March, a group of 48 representatives and 39 senators sought back pay provisions for contractors affected by the government shutdown in supplemental 2019 or fiscal year 2020 appropriations bills.

Lawmakers are also looking for more detail on federal telework activity and for county-level data on federal employment to be added to OPM's FedScope database.

Reader comments

Fri, Jun 14, 2019

It is a great proposal to hire former personnel experts reduce the back log at OPM. OPM folks do great work and the retirement transition went smoothly. They do great for the limitations that they have to deal with. Now congress and senate should actually work and get something accomplished (note they have not done anything in years) where OPM stays intact and they get the funding and resources to continue doing a great job. Overloading employees is a bad situation, it leads to stress related illnesses, burn out and attrition.

Wed, Jun 12, 2019 HR OPM Retired Fed

Why doesn't OPM/Retirement Services hire previously retired OPMers or retired Benefit Officers to help clean up the backlog? Exempt them from the offset to pay and hire them on a temp basis and get this damn backlog cleaned up!

Tue, Jun 11, 2019 Luke

Man! These people are short-sited. The first line of this article: "House appropriators want OPM to improve on its core duties including retirement processing without support from a planned merger with the General Services Administration." What makes these people think that OPM is going to do any better (without support) than it's been doing the last twelve years? OPM is a train wreck and nobody has had the guts to repair it for several administrations....until now.

Tue, Jun 11, 2019

This MANDATE to hire ONLY Veterans is really affecting the federal workforce, as now civilians have to deal with people with PTSD on a daily basis, and is really delaying the work we do significantly.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Contributors

Edward A. Zurndorfer Certified Financial Planner
Mike Causey Columnist
Tom Fox VP for Leadership and Innovation, Partnership for Public Service
Mathew B. Tully Legal Analyst

Free E-Newsletter

FederalDAILY

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.

Stay Connected

Latest Forum Posts

Ask the Expert

Have a question regarding your federal employee benefits or retirement?

Submit a question