By Mark Van Scyoc Royalty-free stock photo ID: 285175268

White House pushes OPM-GSA merger

The Trump administration is pushing ahead with a plan to merge the Office of Personnel Management with General Services Administration and the Executive Office of the President, and is exploring what can be done without congressional approval.

Margaret Weichert, the acting director of the Office of Personnel Management, said the administration is currently "finalizing some of the legal authorities" to carry out what can be done without Congress.

"We think there's a huge amount around HR services, IT and many of the shared services we would be able to do administratively, using a variety of vehicles," she told reporters after a March 20 event hosted by the National Academy for Public Administration.

The plan calls for the policy side of OPM to be merged into the White House and for insurance and pensions and other back office functions to move to GSA.

"I think some of the pure statutory elements defined in Title 5 and elsewhere, particularly around the trust funds, and the pure policy and oversight activities, would require legislation," she said, adding that a adding a proposal is "coming out soon."

Weichert said that “most of the people at OPM would be put into a shared agency that is a mission-support agency,” to be housed at GSA. A few policy posts would migrate to the Office of Management and Budget. Under current law, the director of OPM is a Senate-confirmed position. But it’s unclear whether that position status would change under the merger. An OMB spokesperson referred questions on the position to OPM. OPM did not respond by press time.

The administration is seeking $50 million in no-year money in the 2020 budget to support the merger -- the first cost estimate of the reorganization proposed last year.

"Funding will be used to purchase new equipment, analyze and incorporate OPM business processes into GSA processes, incorporate OPM systems into GSA's network, move and transition OPM staff, and perform audit and security assessments of those systems," the budget states. "Transition costs are primarily driven by the IT-related remediation and transformation work necessary to ensure OPM IT systems are securely integrated into GSA's network."

At a congressional hearing last year, GSA Administrator Emily Murphy told lawmakers IT consolidation would be a significant part of the transition.

Reader comments

Tue, Mar 26, 2019 David

This is just rearranging chairs. This White House doesn't have anything worthwhile to do.

Mon, Mar 25, 2019

Why doesn't he just declare an emergency?
It worked for his stupid wall.

Mon, Mar 25, 2019

Transition out the bloated management we find in the federal government. They do nothing worth their grades and benefits and often are an impediment in workers ability to provide services.

Fri, Mar 22, 2019

Another idiotic inefficient destructive policy to current and new federal employees. What is next sequestration in which employees will be forced to work with no possibility of compensation while the minions in congress and senate will be paid regardless to what they accomplish.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Contributors

Edward A. Zurndorfer Certified Financial Planner
Mike Causey Columnist
Tom Fox VP for Leadership and Innovation, Partnership for Public Service
Mathew B. Tully Legal Analyst

Free E-Newsletter

FederalDAILY

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.

Stay Connected

Latest Forum Posts

Ask the Expert

Have a question regarding your federal employee benefits or retirement?

Submit a question