A sign outside the Smithsonan


Shutdown having 'a rotting effect on morale'

Feds are getting a lot of practice at closing up the government, and to some extent they know the drill, according to two veterans of previous shutdowns. However, the current shutdown is drifting into uncharted waters, with agencies having to reconsider their shutdown plans. Additionally, reopening government agencies after a shutdown and picking up required activity from a full stop carries its own set of costs.

After the 16-day shutdown in 2013, officials at the Office of Management and Budget put together a set of procedures for dealing with lapses in appropriations, including requiring shutdown plans from agencies.

Dave Mader, formerly acting deputy director for management at OMB, said he was "struck with how organized his agency was" when it came to executing shutdowns.

"We went through the drill two or three times in my tenure there. What I was pleased with was the fact that they had built a repeatable process. Agencies weren't making things up as they went along," said Mader, who now works at Deloitte as civilian sector chief strategy officer in the firm's government and public services practice.

But OMB's orderly plans are designed for brief shutdowns. If the current partial shutdown endures past a few weeks, agencies are going to have to reconsider their priorities, Mader said.

"There's things you can do if it's going to last a day or two," he said. As a shutdown lingers, Mader said "you need to revisit the decisions you make ... it's a constant re-examination of the critical aspects of your mission and how many people you need to perform those critical missions."

The shutdown also impacts workers as they return from furlough.

"Work is piling up, and that backlog needs to be addressed when the government reopens," said Doug Criscitello, formerly chief financial officer of the Department of Housing and Urban Development and current executive director of the Center for Finance and Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "But it's not as if workers are coming back from vacation -- tanned rested and with their batteries recharged. They're coming back from a break, full of anxiety, where their professional value has been called into question by the elected leaders they're intended to serve."

The overall experience has a "rotting effect on morale," Criscitello said. "That is an overarching concern in reopening after a shutdown of significant length -- and I think we're at that point now."

Undermining 2020

Another big concern for the future is the president's 2020 budget submission, which is due in the first week of February and almost guaranteed to be late at this point, with much of OMB's career staff on furlough.

A late budget submission isn't extraordinary, but a prolonged delay has an impact on future plans said Criscitello, who served in a career post at OMB and worked on many budgets.

"The nitty-gritty budgetary calculations of what it takes to operate agencies [produced by OMB] is really the starting point" for budget negotiations, Criscitello said. "Even if the House and Senate develop their own budget proposals, their starting point is the financial information provided by OMB. Without that, you can't really get started in an informed way," he said.

"The already dysfunctional budget process will break down just as its getting started. Not only did the 2019 process fail but we may be undermining the 2020 process," Criscitello said.

Mader pointed out that there's unfinished business at OMB for 2019 funding, with the passage into law of seven appropriations needed to end the current standoff.

"Once there's a resolution for this, then the OMB budget examiners are going to have to kick into high gear and do apportionment for the agencies for 2019, because we're three months into the current fiscal year," Mader said.

The shuttered agencies will also face problems getting their contractor workforces and procurement activities restarted.

"It's not as simple as a light switch to get everything going again," Criscitello said.

Reader comments

Wed, Jan 23, 2019

This is just a scam to reduce the Federal workforce. Who in their right mind would rush to get a job in the Federal Gov't now. You'd have to be desperate or bottom of the barrel. Great job for promotion. Besides lowest bid, we'll get lowest quality.

Mon, Jan 14, 2019

Time to reduce the number of elected officials in congress and senate. Down grade their pay and benefits with a strict term limitation. Then look at the lousy gender aged biased managers who back stab productive employees so they can line themselves up for bonuses and promotions.

Mon, Jan 14, 2019 Ralph Western states

Federal morale has been going down all through the days of Obama. He was brutal to the federal employees. 3 years, no COLAs, and the other years for the most part, not even a COLA to match the CLI. Fact is, skilled federal workers are not glued in loyalty like they used to be. Game playing with their jobs, lack of raises, sequestration, and many things have gone in to a very insecure federal workforce with employees finding commercial sector jobs that pay better and appear to be more stable. The cost to shutdowns in the long run will be staggering for the American people. Democrats heels dug in is really costing Americans dearly. Trump isn't helping. Side note. For those who claim a wall will not secure our borders, you are half right, and half wrong. It is part of the answer to secure our borders, but can't do the complete job by itself.

Fri, Jan 11, 2019 Elad McI Wash DC

To those who insist former Democratic Presidents called for a physical border (wall) between the US and Mexico, sorry, didn't happen! Every search by name, by party, by role, etc comes up with one, and only one name....only Trump wants a wall, and, he backed out of an agreement by both parties to sign a deal minus wall funds, because conservative talking TV heads and radio "but I'm only doing entertainment" types who normally stroke Trump's ego, negatively poked his ego about it. That and the fact that he is now pushing for a steel fence instead. And before you think this would be good for American steel, check again. Do some honest, unbiased real research, find out who really owns at least one of the biggest steel suppliers in the US, and who they are connected to. Hint: how is your Russian?

Fri, Jan 11, 2019

Democrats and republican elected officials are nothing but festering swamp slime and scum. America wake up and vote all these minions out when it is time to do so.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above


Edward A. Zurndorfer Certified Financial Planner
Mike Causey Columnist
Tom Fox VP for Leadership and Innovation, Partnership for Public Service
Mathew B. Tully Legal Analyst

Free E-Newsletter


I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.

Stay Connected

Latest Forum Posts

Ask the Expert

Have a question regarding your federal employee benefits or retirement?

Submit a question