Ohio lawmaker opposes Pon's retirement cuts proposal

While the Office of Personnel Management director wants to make federal employee retirement benefits more in line with the public sector, one lawmaker says the proposed changes only make the federal government a less attractive employer than the private sector.

“With the United States’ growing economy and a tightening labor market, we cannot afford to make the federal government a less attractive place to work by diminishing the very benefits that help the government keep pace with jobs in the (often higher-paying) private sector,” Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio) said in a letter to Office of Personnel Management Director Jeff Pon.

Last week, Pon proposed four major changes to federal employee retirement benefits: 1) eliminate the Federal Employees’ Retirement System annuity supplements for new retirees and survivor annuitants; 2) increase the Civil Service Retirement System and FERS average pay period to five years from three years; 3) increase FERS employees’ contribution to their retirement to one percent each year until they reach 7.25 percent of basic pay; and 4) reduce or eliminate retirement cost-of-living adjustments.

The Dayton, Ohio region—in which Turner represents— has more than 30,000 federal employees. Employees that Turner says have already been burdened by a three-year pay freeze, followed by a menial pay increase, and have forgone about $182 billion in pay and benefit cuts. The proposed changes are expected to save $143 billion over 10 years if all four changes are enacted.

“We should not arbitrarily make changes to policies that families have planned their lives around…” Turner said.

Read the full letter here.

Reader comments

Tue, May 22, 2018

Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio) must be up for re-election! After he gets in again lets see if he will turn on the federal workforce.

Fri, May 18, 2018

Maybe Pon could take a 50% cut in salary and benefits and show how it will benefit federal employees.

Wed, May 16, 2018

Remove most management and SES do nothings and with those savings pay the federal employees their due.

Tue, May 15, 2018

Smarten-up Pon

Tue, May 15, 2018

FINALLY!!! There is someone in Congress/Senate who understands. In certain locations of the Government, OPMs are having issues obtaining and keeping good employees. It will only get worse, if these cuts are allowed to happened. It's very obvious that Pon is NOT a wage earner and is NOT a dedicated federal employee. SHAME we can vote him out.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Contributors

Edward A. Zurndorfer Certified Financial Planner
Mike Causey Columnist
Tom Fox VP for Leadership and Innovation, Partnership for Public Service
Mathew B. Tully Legal Analyst

Free E-Newsletter

FederalDAILY

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.

Stay Connected

Latest Forum Posts

Ask the Expert

Have a question regarding your federal employee benefits or retirement?

Submit a question