Gov Career

By Phil Piemonte

Blog archive

Retirement—is it time to run for the hills?

For years—as in many years—those who watch the federal government have predicted that a “retirement tsunami” and a subsequent “brain drain” would hit the federal workplace when the Baby Boomers started to reach retirement age. 

But year after year—because they either wanted to or needed to work longer—these Boomers failed to exit on cue.  

Still, this large cohort of feds continued to age in place, so to speak, and the numbers remained on the side of those doing the predicting, so the forecast has persisted for the better part of a decade.

But things may have changed in favor of the prognosticators. Maybe not a tsunami, but … 

If you have ever been on the beach when a hurricane is 1,000 or so miles off, you may have observed the following phenomenon. A wave comes in normally. Then the wave goes back out. And out, and out, and out some more. 

You now can see sandbars you didn’t know were there, suddenly exposed, hundreds of yards offshore.

Then the ocean pauses for what seems like a long time, and then the wave starts to come back in. Real fast.

And you, after a frown and a moment’s thought, turn and start to run for higher ground, back up over the dunes. 

That moment may be approaching for the federal government. 

According to a report in the Federal Times this week, Office of Personnel Management statistics show that in the first 10 months of 2011, retirement applications grew 24 percent over what they were at the same point in 2010. 

At that rate, according to the publication, the number of retirement applications could reach about 104,700 by the end of this calendar year. The numbers really jumped in October, the report said—42 percent higher than in the same month the prior year, and 60 percent more than in October 2009.

There certainly are lots of motivators and incentives to retire these days—both positive and negative. Far more then there were even a few months ago. 

From good to bad to worse, these include (to name only a few) buyouts and early retirement offers, the two-year federal pay freeze, and threats to extend the freeze and make what some call “draconian” changes to federal retirement benefits.

Federal pay and benefits have been under intense, continual legislative attack for more than a year. Even though the most radical efforts have failed so far, at this point those who advocate trimming the federal workforce might finally be succeeding in simply scaring it smaller without even passing legislation.

Right at this moment in Congress, bills are circulating that propose to do any number of things that would make federal employment less appealing to long-time feds, and seem like less of a good employment deal to prospective ones.

As a result, the attitude among a growing number of feds—in particular those who are eligible for retirement—increasingly seems to be “git while the gittin’s good.”

Are you one of them? Let us know.

Posted by Phil Piemonte on Dec 13, 2011 at 4:02 PM


Reader comments

Fri, Mar 2, 2012 Lyta

I have worked for the federal govt. for 36 years. Yes, I'm scared. I almost took an early out/buy out last Dec. but didn't because I'd lose about $133 a month for life. All the attacks on our benefits are scary. High 5 instead of high 3; Continued COLA freeze; freeze step increases; cut back on number of federal employees; unpaid 2 week furlough, etc. See URL: http://www.federalemployeefacts.com/

This page shows political statements against federal employees and the correct information in response to it. Such as federal workers earn more than private workers. This refers to a report by the Bureau of Labor Statistics that says we earn 26% less than the private sector.

Wed, Feb 29, 2012 Baby Boomers!

Do the math. Baby boomers have not reached the 66 years of age for full retirement! Japan surrendered in Septembe of 1946, The US declared the end of hostilities on Dec 31, 1946, thus relieving a lot of troups from duty. Guess how long it took after that for the 1st Baby boomer to be born? (9 month if you have not figured it out. The 1st baby boomer would have been born in late April or May of 1947. 1947 + 66 = 2012. May of 2012 is not hear yet!

Wed, Feb 8, 2012

I'm a 24 year fed and still trying to figure out what I want to be when I grow up.

Thu, Dec 22, 2011 Viola Eaton DCMA-Los Angeles

When I received my Social Security card, this was the notice to me, you are old, so retire. I am CSRS with 32 years, so why take up space? I had my fun and I'm leaving out a Single woman as a GS-11 Step 10. I never wanted the GS-12 it would put me in a higher income bracket, so I took the pay increases in accordance with the economy to avoid paying additional taxes. None of us will get rich on the job, we work to have independance and health benefits; I am happy because I have been blessed to have both. Stop worrying about the economy, the politians, bills and so forth becuase these things will go on with or without you. When it's time to retire, just go.

Wed, Dec 21, 2011

I could retire today if I wanted to with 36 years, but I'm single and need to get some bills paid off first. I do have my retirement date set - May 2014.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Contributors

Edward A. Zurndorfer Certified Financial Planner
Mike Causey Columnist
Tom Fox VP for Leadership and Innovation, Partnership for Public Service
Mathew B. Tully Legal Analyst

Free E-Newsletter

FederalDAILY

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.

Stay Connected

Latest Forum Posts

Ask the Expert

Have a question regarding your federal employee benefits or retirement?

Submit a question