Shutterstock ID 792858589 by Andrey_Popov

Workforce

1.9 percent pay raise likely included in funding bill

A long-sought pay raise for federal civilian workers appears to be packaged in appropriations bills to keep the government fully open for the rest of the fiscal year.

A 1.9 percent pay raise was included in the Senate funding bill that covered Treasury and general government operations in the last Congress, although at the time Republicans declined to sign on. Now the measure appears to be headed for inclusion in the final bill.

In public comments, President Donald Trump has indicated that he's inclined to sign a compromise bill and look for additional funding for his border security priorities administratively.

Back pay for contractors furloughed during the 35-day shutdown had also been proposed as part of the funding bill, but Wednesday-night press reports said that provision was dropped from the final conference report.

According to Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), a Congressional Budget Office estimated that it would cost $1 billion to deliver back pay to contractors. The provision had put an emphasis on contractors with earnings under $50,000 per year.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) made a plea for contractor pay on the Senate floor on Feb. 13, but Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) told reporters on Capitol Hill Feb. 13 that Trump "won't sign" a bill that includes such a provision.

Shutdown payroll problems

Three weeks after the shutdown, and days before the current continuing resolution is set to expire, federal employees have continued to get incomplete, delayed and inaccurate paychecks — and others remain unpaid, according to president of the American Federation of Employees J. David Cox.

In a letter, Reps. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) and Jennifer Wexton (D-Va.) asked the heads of the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Personnel Management for answers.

The lawmakers cited reports of "shorted pay and inconsistent tax deductions that left workers unable to make mortgage or rent payments," as well as paychecks that didn't reflect various adjustments "which have resulted in confusion and additional burdens on federal workers."

Shortly after Congress temporarily reopened government, acting OPM director Margaret Weichert warned federal employees that there could be some issues with back pay as agencies worked to process paychecks quickly.

While the lawmakers commended OPM for urging agencies to issue backpay promptly, they raised concerns about the guidance, namely the direction of payroll providers to "make some simplifying assumptions." Specifically, the lawmakers want a progress report on where each agency affected by the shutdown stands in terms of getting accurate back pay to its employees.

They asked how many federal workers were furloughed in the shutdown, how many worked without pay, and how many are still owed back pay. They also asked about the administration’s plans to make sure backpay is processed accurately as soon as possible, and what information agencies have shared with employees to make sure their tax deductions are accurate.

The legislators want to know what options feds have for paying wage garnishments after the fact, and what information have agencies provided in this regard.

They requested a response by Feb. 26.

Reader comments

Tue, Feb 19, 2019

THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION DID NOT WANT TO PROVIDE FEDERAL EMPLOYEES A RAISE FOR 2019; HOWEVER CLAIMS TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRONGEST ECONOMY EVER! SEVERAL YEARS BACK WHEN ANY RAISES WERE FROZEN, WE COULD UNDERSTAND, BUT TO DO IT WHEN THINGS ARE GREAT DEMOSTRATES WHAT THE FEDERAL WORKFORCE MEANS TO THE PRESIDENT. HE CARES MORE FOR THE RICH AND CORPORATE AMERICA. HOPE THE FEDERAL WORKFORCE WHO VOTED FOR THIS ADMINISTRATION THINGS ABOUT THIS IN 2020.

Mon, Feb 18, 2019

Senate and congress grow up and be ashamed of yourselves. Same with the talk a lot do nothing unions.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Contributors

Edward A. Zurndorfer Certified Financial Planner
Mike Causey Columnist
Tom Fox VP for Leadership and Innovation, Partnership for Public Service
Mathew B. Tully Legal Analyst

Free E-Newsletter

FederalDAILY

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.

Stay Connected

Latest Forum Posts

Ask the Expert

Have a question regarding your federal employee benefits or retirement?

Submit a question