protestors in hart senate office building jan 23 2019

Feds protest shutdown on Capitol Hill

Federal employees demonstrating against the month-old government shutdown filled the lobby of the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill on Jan. 23.

After a largely silent protest lasting about 33 minutes – to represent the number of days of the shutdown -- hundreds of feds and supporters began chanting, "no more food banks" and "we need paychecks," before Capitol Police warned protestors to stop and disperse.

While most protestors ultimately cleared the Senate offices without incident, dozens of protestors took to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's (R-Ky.) office in a nearby Senate building, where some chanted and sat in the hallway until they were arrested and escorted out of the building. Maybe a dozen protestors, including president of the American Federation of Government Employees J. David Cox, were arrested.

Brad Hufford, a furloughed FEMA employee who traveled from Colorado to attend, said he heard about the protests yesterday and decided it was important to attend.

"Yesterday morning I was on my couch," he said, saying he used travel points to make the last-minute trip.

Hufford, whose office manages $1.5 billion in grants, said he feared the widespread furloughs add risk in the event of an earthquake or other natural disaster. But even without a disaster, Hufford said that there's financial risk of his grants portfolio going unmonitored.

"I'm not making sure those are managed in a fiscally responsible way," he said. "That's the type of work that goes unnoticed."

Michael Knowles, an asylum officer at the U.S. Center for Immigration Services, said while his particular office remains open because it's funded through fees, much of the data his office relies on requires collaboration with employees who have been furloughed.

Those interagency projects and tasks that touch the work "everybody does" have limited the effect of even the areas that have stayed open, or are excepted as essential, such as the law enforcement components of the Department of Homeland Security.

He said some of the IT workers who were sent home earlier in the shutdown have recently been called back and reassigned to work in other, fee-funded areas of the department.

Matthew Sisson, Commanding Officer for the Research and Development Center at the Coast Guard, said he'll have to start dipping into his 401K and Thrift Savings Plan funds next month.

Sisson's office is working on the consolidation of three antiquated tech systems. The shutdown has disrupted that rollout, and workarounds are costly. He said he fears qualified tech employees, even if they don't leave government altogether, could decamp to the Department of Defense as a result of the lapse in pay.

The Office of Personnel Management is trying to mitigate some of the effects of the shutdown on essential and excepted employees working without pay. In a Jan. 23 memo, acting OPM Director Margaret Weichert urged managers to permit telework and flexible schedules where possible, and to permit excepted employees to request and use time off or to obtain excused periods of absence to be considered as furlough status – for which they will be paid after the government is reopened.

Congress looks no closer to a solution on the underlying dispute over the controversial border wall. The U.S. Senate will hold two votes on Thursday on bills to reopen the government, one based on a White House proposal with wall funding and another from the House which would reopen government through Feb. 8 that doesn't include funding for the border wall.

Reader comments

Fri, Jan 25, 2019

Trump really needs a Mommy. I am no expert but I am pretty sure any competent leader would never stop paying people to get his way. He obviously needs adult supervision.

Fri, Jan 25, 2019 Puregoldj Bethesda, MD

How about Congress doesn't get paid for any time that any part of the government is shut down. I'll bet we'd have considerably less government shutdown!

Fri, Jan 25, 2019

"he had no choice"... I think that the expression you were looking for was "he had no right". Security of a wall that has no merit should not override the security of individuals (financial) or security of the country (furloughed employees not performing their duties to/for the country and the people therein). "a wall for security" - how ridiculous - walls, like screen doors only keep out the people who did not want to enter to begin with. Walls as a primary security function have not worked in 11,500 years (Temple of Gobekli in Urfa - had problems with looters... walls did not work.) For $5.6B a lot of other more realistic security can be enacted with a greater degree of efficiency and reliability and not one of those programs would line the pockets of Trump's co-conspirators being hired to build the wall.

Fri, Jan 25, 2019

"I am a federal employee and I believe in the President. He had no choice." Sigh, another post from a Russian troll...

Fri, Jan 25, 2019

I am a federal employee and I believe in the President. He had no choice.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Contributors

Edward A. Zurndorfer Certified Financial Planner
Mike Causey Columnist
Tom Fox VP for Leadership and Innovation, Partnership for Public Service
Mathew B. Tully Legal Analyst

Free E-Newsletter

FederalDAILY

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.

Stay Connected

Latest Forum Posts

Ask the Expert

Have a question regarding your federal employee benefits or retirement?

Submit a question